I have three: a wolf, a raven, and an owl. There are characteristics of each animal that play into what I write. Wolves and ravens are both hunters and scavengers. Alone, they scavenge and together they hunt. One species hunts and scavenges from the air, all-seeing, and one from the ground, where the experience is more personal. Owls, on the other hand, prefer to hunt and prefer to do it at night. They also kill silently. They are the slashers of the animal kingdom.
Two at the very least. I have a day job that also involves writing so, technically, I’m doing that somewhere between eight and ten hours per day. However, my fiction gets at least two hours in the late afternoons or evening. On days that I can devote more time to it, I’ll go on a six-to-eight-hour marathon. Usually, those marathons are more about rewriting than first draft.
Yes, I do read them. For now. I enjoy feedback, whether positive or critical, because I think it seeds my thought processes for the next time I write. Many times, the more critical reviews come from people who either couldn’t relate to the characters or couldn’t relate to the situation. That makes me want to make more of an effort to find a way to relate to the critic the next time around. Sometimes a scene I’m working on will trigger the memory of some criticism about a particular way I handled things in another story, and that might cause me to think harder about what I’m doing. However, I rely much more on beta readers than straight-up reviews for the type of feedback that is bound to change the words I’ve put down.
The term for that is Easter Eggs, and I don’t typically do that. In my latest novel, The Gordon Place, there are a few things here and there that only people who have read my previous short story collection Road Kills might get. However, I only put them there as part of my world building process. The little town in which The Gordon Place is set has been lurking in my imagination for many years now, so it several of my short stories have connections to it. While I was writing the novel, I wanted to keep one foot grounded in the foundation for the town that I had already laid in previous stories. The little nods to my short stories were my way of doing that.
Fiction, definitely. I do read non-fiction, but it’s much more difficult for me to get through a 200-page work of non-fiction than it is a 400-page story.
Stand-alone. I know the trend for some time has been to write series tales. I just can’t summon enough interest in a given character to want to read seven or eight books about that character. I’m a huge Stephen King fan, but I very nearly put down his Dark Tower series after I read Wizard and Glass. The magic of the first three book got lost somehow during the long stretch of time between The Waste Lands and Wizard and Glass. I’ve often wondered if that magic might have been better sustained if King had written the fourth book earlier. When King inserted himself as a character later on, finishing the series became more of a “Well, I’ve come this far” thing for me than my having any actual interest in the story. I felt the same way when J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series reached the fifth book. I actually very much regret reading Thomas Harris’ last two books featuring Hannibal Lecter. I feel like the character suffered immensely from them.
Horror. I enjoy science fiction, too, but not nearly as much as horror. Too much modern science fiction insists on building worlds that are difficult to relate to as a reader. I think horror does a better job of creating characters and settings that are relatable, although I’m sure sci-fi fans would disagree.
King. I’ve read at least three of Dean Koontz’s novels over the years, but there are many other horror authors I would bump ahead of him in my to-be-read list (John Skipp, Cody Goodfellow, Danger Slater, Richard Matheson, Peter Straub, Jeff Strand, and so many more).
Read the book, THEN watch the movie.
ebook. I understand people who prefer physical copies. I really do. But I’ve spent more than four decades collecting physical books. I have so many that if I want to reference something, I have a difficult time finding it. Also, reading ebooks on a reader like the Kindle Paperwhite is a much more comfortable experience than a physical copy. The Paperwhite is the device that actually converted me. You can read in any light conditions and there’s no struggling to position yourself so that you’re comfortable and it’s easy to turn pages. The Paperwhite makes physical books feel unwieldy to me.
Computer and wi-fi only. The library’s a great place, but it’s easier and faster to get information via Google. There’s a reason the Card Catalog and the Dewey Decimal System have primarily become a thing of the past.
I’d totally prefer a cross-country book store tour, but that’s only because I like to visit new places.
1 comments:
thanks for hosting
Post a Comment